Reported Withdrawal Problems & Complaints about FBS

Withdrawal is the moment where a Forex trading account stops being “numbers on a platform” and becomes money back in your card, bank account, or wallet. That’s why withdrawal complaints carry more emotional weight than almost any other broker issue. When traders report problems with FBS withdrawals, the complaints usually cluster around a few repeat patterns: delays, rejected requests, method restrictions, verification demands, and “net amount” surprises caused by fees or provider rules.

It’s also true that FBS has many public reviews that describe withdrawals as smooth and fast. But a “no issues” experience does not erase the reported complaints, and the complaints are consistent enough across multiple public forums and review pages that they are worth understanding as a set of common failure points.

Invite a Friend to FBS

The most reported withdrawal complaint categories

Across trader forums, review platforms, and complaint-style posts, the reported issues typically fall into these groups:

• Withdrawal delays (pending approvals, waiting longer than expected)
• Rejected withdrawals (declined requests, repeated denials)
• Verification and source-of-funds demands (extra documents, proof of ownership of funding sources)
• Deposit-method restrictions (withdrawal must follow the deposit method, method no longer usable, “use local bank” messages)
• Partial withdrawals or unexpected amounts (requested amount not paid exactly as entered)
• Fees and “net amount” surprises (wallet providers charging fees even if broker commission is advertised as zero)
• Communication gaps (support replies that feel generic, tracking references that don’t satisfy the trader)
• Impersonation and clone-site complaints (people reporting withdrawals blocked on domains that appear separate from the primary brand)

Each category has its own logic, and most of them are not unique to FBS. They are typical of how regulated and semi-regulated payment rails behave when a broker sits in the middle between the trader and external banks/wallet providers. Still, the impact on the trader is the same: money not arriving when expected.

Reported withdrawal delays

Open an account with FBS

What “delay” complaints look like

A delay complaint usually reads like this: the trader submits a withdrawal request, sees it marked as pending/processing/approved, and then waits longer than expected for funds to arrive. Some posts describe multiple days of waiting for card withdrawals, or longer waits when a bank transfer is involved.

FBS itself states card withdrawals are “usually processed” within a short multi-day window, and if funds have not arrived by then, it points users toward requesting withdrawal confirmation through support.

That statement matters because it sets a baseline expectation: a card withdrawal is not necessarily instant even if the broker-side approval looks quick.

Why delays are commonly reported

Delays can happen in two places:

• Broker-side processing (internal checks, approval queue, verification holds)
• Payment-rail processing (bank or card network posting time, intermediary processing)

Complaint posts often blur the two. A trader sees “approved” and assumes funds should already be in the bank. But card and bank rails can post later than the broker’s approval step.

There are also third-party writeups that describe “delayed processing” as one of the common pain points traders mention around FBS withdrawals.

Invite a Friend to FBS

A common trigger: method switching

Some delays are linked to method changes—when a trader tries to withdraw through a method different from the original deposit method, or the original method is no longer usable, the request can stall and turn into a longer back-and-forth.

This is not a minor detail. It shows up repeatedly in the rejection stories described next.

Reported rejected withdrawals and repeated declines

Open an account with FBS

“My withdrawal keeps getting rejected”

Rejection complaints are more severe than delay complaints. Instead of “it’s slow,” the trader reports: “it was declined,” “it was rejected,” or “it was not authorized.” Some posts describe multiple denied requests and a growing list of additional requirements.

A Forex Peace Army complaint thread describes a trader stating they made a deposit, traded into profit, and then had many withdrawal requests denied while being asked to prove the deposit source and provide extensive proof of ownership and source of funds.

Another Forex Peace Army thread describes a trader reporting profit, then withdrawal rejection, and confusion about the method record after account changes.

These are not identical stories, but the pattern is consistent: the trader believes the money is legitimate and withdrawable, while the broker’s process treats the account as needing more verification before releasing funds.

Verification and source-of-funds complaints

Invite a Friend to FBS

What traders report being asked for

In serious complaint posts, traders describe being asked for additional documents beyond basic identity verification. The commonly reported items include:

• Proof the deposit method belongs to the trader
• Proof of income or source of funds
• Screens or videos showing ownership of a wallet or account

The Forex Peace Army complaint about “no withdrawal” explicitly describes repeated denials and being asked to prove deposit source and provide supporting documentation.

Why this happens in Forex withdrawals

Even if a trader is focused only on Forex trading, withdrawals sit inside payment compliance rules. Brokers and payment providers often apply anti-fraud and anti-money-laundering checks at the withdrawal stage because it is the point where money leaves the broker’s environment.

This is the reason many complaints include a “moving goalposts” feeling: the trader deposits and trades without interruption, but the system demands more information when money is leaving.

This does not automatically mean wrongdoing by either side. It means the withdrawal stage is treated as higher risk than a deposit.

Open an account with FBS

Deposit-method restrictions and “use the same method” disputes

The core dispute: “I used the same method, but it still failed”

A frequent theme in complaints is the idea that the trader did everything “right” by attempting to withdraw using the same method they deposited with—yet the request was still rejected.

One Forex Peace Army case describes a trader who reported that their card withdrawal attempts were rejected because they could not use the original deposit method after roughly a year, forcing them to use another method instead.

This kind of complaint shows a practical reality of payment rails: a method can be “the original method” but still become unusable due to provider rules, time limits, account changes, or regional availability.

Invite a Friend to FBS

“They told me to use a local bank”

Another reported pattern is a sudden instruction to withdraw via “local bank” even though the trader previously used a wallet method. A Forex Peace Army thread describes a trader saying they used Perfect Money, were told to use local bank, and later saw a withdrawal reversed after initially being allowed to withdraw through the wallet.

This is the kind of situation that fuels complaints, because it feels inconsistent: “you allowed it, then you reversed it.”

Account changes that confuse method records

Some rejection stories also mention account-type changes, like balances being transferred between account types or accounts being closed, followed by withdrawal failures that feel linked to missing deposit-method records.

Whether or not the record truly “got lost,” the reported experience is consistent: once the account structure changes, the trader sometimes experiences withdrawal friction.

Open an account with FBS

Partial withdrawals and unexpected amounts

Not all complaints are “blocked.” Some are “the system did not let me withdraw what I entered.”

On Trustpilot, a reviewer describes attempting to withdraw a specific amount, being unable to do so, and then seeing a smaller amount withdrawn instead, followed by another withdrawal attempt that also withdrew less than requested.

This type of complaint can come from multiple sources:

• Minimum/maximum limits per transaction for the chosen method
• Method-specific fee structures that reduce the net amount received
• Platform rounding rules
• Split processing when withdrawals are tied to multiple deposit legs

Even when the underlying logic is mechanical, the trader experiences it as a mismatch between “requested amount” and “paid amount.”

Fee complaints and “zero commission” misunderstandings

Invite a Friend to FBS

The common complaint: “withdrawal fees are high”

Some users praise fast withdrawals but complain about fees on the withdrawal side. On Trustpilot, one reviewer says they like that deposit charges are removed but says withdrawal charges are still high.

This complaint is common across Forex brokers because “broker commission” and “payment provider fee” are not the same thing. A broker can advertise low or zero commission while the wallet or bank still charges fees.

When “zero commission” still leads to cost

A Forex Peace Army follow-up post describes a trader switching to an e-wallet that appeared as zero commission, then discovering the wallet itself charged percentage-based and fixed fees to move money onward to a bank account.

For traders, this feels like a bait-and-switch even when it is not. The broker can be charging zero, while the wallet provider charges. The trader cares about total cost, not the billing label.

Open an account with FBS

Complaints about missing funds after “approved” status

Some complaint-style posts go further than delays and say the funds never arrived, even after the expected time window.

WikiFX exposure pages include user-submitted claims such as “withdrawal did not arrive,” “support only provided tracking,” and distrust around the tracking details.

This is one of the hardest complaint types to resolve in public forums because the internal payment trace details are usually private.

Bonus-related disputes that spill into withdrawals

Even when a complaint is posted as “withdrawal problem,” the root can be bonus conditions, promo credits, or trading-volume requirements tied to a campaign.

A public broker review-style page states that some traders feel bonus rules are strict and that profits linked to bonuses can be difficult to withdraw.

Another trader-review page includes a comment suggesting that many withdrawal issues are promotion-related and tied to not aligning with the promo terms.

You do not need to accept every claim in those pages as universal truth to see the recurring theme: bonus programs can create misunderstandings that show up at withdrawal time.

This is especially relevant in Forex because leverage and margin can make bonus credit feel like real equity during trading, but the withdrawal rules for credit-based promotions can be more restrictive than traders assume.

Invite a Friend to FBS

Complaints tied to impersonation and “wrong FBS” websites

A different class of withdrawal complaint is not about the broker’s payment process, but about traders interacting with a site that uses similar branding.

One WikiFX exposure says the website involved was a domain that is not the primary brand domain and describes withdrawal rejection.

When withdrawal complaints involve non-standard domains, it raises a serious risk: the trader may be dealing with an impersonator rather than the intended broker.

FBS itself publishes educational content about Forex scams and how fraud schemes operate in trading.

In the public complaint ecosystem, this matters because “withdrawal problems at FBS” sometimes includes cases where the platform might not be the official service the trader thought it was.

What these complaint patterns mean in practice

A Forex broker withdrawal system sits at the intersection of:

• Your trading account ledger (balance, equity, margin)
• The broker’s internal compliance checks (verification, method ownership)
• External payment rails (card networks, banks, wallets)

Most reported withdrawal problems happen when those layers do not line up cleanly.

Here is the practical meaning of the most common complaint patterns:

Open an account with FBS

If the complaint is “pending”

It often points to either internal processing queues or external posting time. FBS states card withdrawals can take several days, which aligns with how card rails post funds.

If the complaint is “rejected repeatedly”

It commonly points to verification, ownership of the deposit method, or a mismatch between the requested withdrawal route and what the system allows. The Forex Peace Army complaints that mention repeated denials and requests for proof match this pattern.

Invite a Friend to FBS

If the complaint is “use local bank”

It often points to regional availability or routing policy changes for a user’s profile. The forum thread describing a wallet withdrawal being reversed after being allowed illustrates the confusion that can happen when routing rules change mid-process.

If the complaint is “zero commission but I paid fees”

It often means the wallet provider charged fees outside the broker’s commission layer. The Forex Peace Army post describing wallet fees after switching methods is a direct example.

Open an account with FBS

If the complaint includes a strange domain or a different website

It may not be the intended broker platform. Public scam-awareness material from FBS reflects that impersonation is a known Forex risk category.

A balanced view: complaints exist, but so do “fast withdrawal” experiences

Any honest review of reported withdrawal problems should acknowledge that many public reviews describe smooth funding and fast withdrawals. Trustpilot pages for FBS include numerous statements praising deposit and withdrawal speed, alongside the occasional complaint about withdrawal amount behavior or fees.

That mixed picture is typical for large Forex brokers with wide regional coverage. Payment rails vary by country, and user experiences vary by method, verification level, and how closely the withdrawal attempt matches the deposit route.

The reported withdrawal problems and complaints about FBS most often involve delays, repeated rejection of withdrawal requests, additional verification or source-of-funds requirements, and friction caused by deposit-method restrictions—especially when the original deposit route becomes unusable or the system requires “local bank” routing. Some traders also report receiving a different amount than requested, or paying fees even when a method appears to have zero broker commission. Finally, a smaller but important set of complaints appears tied to impersonation or non-standard domains, which is a broader Forex scam pattern that FBS itself warns traders about in its educational content.

Invite a Friend to FBS

FBS Deposits, Withdrawals, and Regulation

When you trade Forex, your strategy and risk control matter—but so does the plumbing behind your account. Deposits and withdrawals are the part of trading that touches your real money: how fast you can fund an account, what methods are available in your region, how withdrawals are routed, and what rules apply when you take profits out. Regulation matters for the same reason. It defines which legal entity serves you, what oversight applies, and what operational standards the broker must follow.

How FBS is regulated and why it matters for Forex traders

FBS operates as a brand used by different regulated entities for different regions. The entity you onboard with is not a small detail—it affects which regulator supervises the broker, how client money is handled, and which investor-protection framework applies.

Open an account with FBS

Cyprus (EU): CySEC-regulated entity

In the European Union, the FBS brand is represented by Tradestone Ltd, which is regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) under license number 331/17.

Under this EU framework, the firm states it applies key protections and compliance standards, including:

• Membership in the Investor Compensation Fund (ICF) of Cyprus (as described by the company as part of its protections)
• Client fund segregation (client money kept separate from the firm’s own funds)
• GDPR data protection alignment
• MiFID / MiFID II compliance for investment services in the EEA

The same page also provides the EU office and registered address details and notes that credit card payments are collected by Tradestone Ltd.

Belize: FSC-regulated entity

For many non-EU regions, the website states it is operated by FBS Markets Inc., registered by the Financial Services Commission (Belize) under the Securities Industry Act, with license number 000102/31, and it includes an office address in Belize City, Belize.

This matters because the rules for onboarding, disclosures, and dispute handling are anchored to this licensed entity when you trade under it.

Invite a Friend to FBS

Australia: ASIC oversight via an Australian licensee

In Australia, the FBS brand is represented locally by an ASIC-licensed structure. The Australia site states it is operated by Intelligent Financial Markets Pty Ltd, trading as FBS Oceania, authorised and regulated by ASIC under AFS Licence number 426359.

The core rule that shapes withdrawals: deposits determine withdrawal routes

Across retail brokerage operations, one rule dominates withdrawals: the broker must follow anti-fraud and anti-money-laundering controls, especially around card chargebacks and third-party payments. FBS states this clearly in its withdrawal guidance:

• You can withdraw funds only to payment systems that were used for deposits.
• When multiple deposit methods were used, withdrawals follow a priority sequence:
  • 1) Cards first (return deposited card funds back to the card)
  • 2) Other payment systems (up to the deposited amount per method)
  • 3) Profits and other balance components (withdrawable to non-card methods)

This affects how you plan deposits. If you want flexibility on profit withdrawals, it helps to understand that card channels are typically used for returning deposited principal first, while profit withdrawals may need a non-card method depending on availability and rules.

Open an account with FBS

Deposit methods at FBS: what you can use to fund a Forex account

FBS supports a broad set of funding methods, and availability depends on your country of residence. The broker’s systems are designed so that you choose from the payment options visible inside your account area.

Bank cards (Visa, Mastercard, Maestro)

For the EU entity’s funding page, FBS lists card options such as Visa, Mastercard, and Maestro, and shows these as instant deposits with 0% commission on that page.

Card funding is popular in Forex because it is fast and familiar. The trade-off is that card withdrawals can take longer than e-wallet payouts due to card-network processing steps.

Invite a Friend to FBS

Bank transfer (wire transfer)

The EU funding page also lists wire transfer, showing 0% commission from the broker side while pointing out that the precise commission amount may depend on your bank, and it shows a typical deposit time measured in business days.

Bank transfers are often chosen for larger deposits or when you prefer direct bank rails. Traders commonly use them when they want a clear banking trail that matches the name on the trading account.

E-wallets and payment systems (Skrill, Neteller, Rapid Transfer)

On the EU funding page, FBS lists Skrill, NETELLER, and RAPID Transfer, showing them as instant deposits with 0% commission on that page.

E-wallets are often used by active Forex traders because they can be fast for both deposits and withdrawals, and they may simplify multi-currency handling compared with cards.

Open an account with FBS

Local bank methods and regional options

FBS states that deposit and withdrawal methods vary by country, and it explicitly refers to the use of Local Banks in regions where they are available inside the account area.

Minimum deposits: what it takes to start funding

FBS states that the minimum deposit to trade can be $5, while also stating that minimums vary by payment system. It gives examples such as Neteller ($10), Skrill ($12), and Perfect Money ($5).

The practical takeaway for Forex traders is that “minimum deposit” is not a single universal number—your available payment rails can raise it. If you are optimizing for a small first deposit, choosing the payment method can matter as much as choosing the account type.

Invite a Friend to FBS

How deposits work inside the account area

FBS describes deposits as an account-area workflow:

• Open the finances section
• Select Deposit
• Choose a payment system available to you
• Enter amount and currency
• Complete the payment steps for that method

It also notes that withdrawals and internal transfers are handled in a similar fashion within the same area, and that you can monitor the status of requests in transaction history.

Withdrawal methods at FBS: speed, routing, and what to expect

Withdrawals are where policy meets reality: routing rules, processing times, and the difference between “broker processing” and “payment network settlement.”

Open an account with FBS

Processing time: broker side vs. payment side

FBS states:

• Withdrawal requests are processed by its financial department within 24 hours
• For digital wallets/payment systems, funds are credited the same day
• For bank accounts or cards, funds are credited in 2–7 business days

This is a key point for Forex planning. Even if the broker processes quickly, the final arrival time depends on the payout rail:

• E-wallets: typically fastest final delivery
• Cards/banks: often slower due to banking/card settlement cycles

The “same method” rule and why it exists

FBS states you can withdraw only to methods used for deposits. This rule is a standard control in regulated financial services: it reduces third-party payment risk and helps ensure funds return to the original source where required.

Invite a Friend to FBS

Withdrawal priority when you used more than one deposit method

FBS lays out a priority scheme:

• 1) Return deposited amounts to card methods first
• 2) Then other payment methods (up to what you deposited via each)
• 3) Then withdraw profit and other balance components through available non-card methods

For a Forex trader, that means your deposit mix shapes your withdrawal flow. If you deposit using multiple rails, your first withdrawals may not be “free choice” until deposited amounts are returned in the defined order.

Local banks and profit withdrawals in supported regions

FBS notes that in regions where local banks are available, certain funds (including profits and other balances) are routed to Local Banks; if local banks are not available, profits can be withdrawn via e-wallets.

Open an account with FBS

Fees and charges: what FBS shows and what can still apply

On the EU funding page, FBS lists multiple deposit options with 0% commission on that page, including cards, wire transfer, Skrill, Rapid Transfer, and Neteller.

The same page also states that some payment methods require a transaction fee when you withdraw funds without trading, and that the company reserves the right to impose a 5% fee to any payment method as it deems necessary in that context.

Also keep in mind a separate category of costs that are not broker fees:

• Bank wire charges from your sending or receiving bank
• Card issuer currency conversion spreads
• E-wallet conversion or transfer fees imposed by the wallet provider

These third-party costs can exist even when the broker lists 0% commission for its own side of the transaction.

Compliance controls that affect deposits and withdrawals

Funding rules are not just “company preference.” They are anchored in AML/KYC obligations and payment-risk controls.

FBS’s AML documentation identifies the Belize entity as regulated by the Financial Services Commission (Belize) under license number 000102/31 and describes collection of identification information for providing services.

In real trading terms, that typically connects to:

• Identity verification before withdrawals (or before higher-risk transactions)
• Name matching: payment accounts generally must be in the same name as the trading account
• Additional checks when transaction patterns look unusual (large one-off deposits, rapid withdrawals, frequent reversals)

Those controls are not there to slow down normal Forex withdrawals—they are there to make withdrawals defensible under financial supervision and payment network rules.

Invite a Friend to FBS

Choosing the best deposit and withdrawal method for Forex trading

If you trade Forex actively, your “best” method is the one that matches your priorities. Here’s a practical way to think about it:

If speed is your priority

E-wallets/payment systems are typically the quickest to receive withdrawals once processed (FBS indicates same-day credit for digital wallets after processing).

Open an account with FBS

If banking clarity is your priority

Bank transfers provide direct bank rails, but deposits and withdrawals can take longer than e-wallet rails.

If simplicity is your priority

Bank cards are easy to use, but withdrawals to cards can take longer, and card-first routing rules can shape your withdrawal sequence.

Invite a Friend to FBS

If your goal is smooth profit withdrawals

• Understand the routing rules before you deposit. Because withdrawals must go back through deposit-used methods and often return deposited card funds first, your deposit choice can either streamline or complicate later withdrawals.
• In regions where Local Banks are available in the account area, FBS indicates profit withdrawals may be routed there.

FBS supports multiple deposit and withdrawal rails, with the available set depending on your country and on the regulated entity that serves you. The EU offering lists common methods such as Visa/Mastercard/Maestro, wire transfers, Skrill, Rapid Transfer, and Neteller, with 0% commission shown on that page, and it also states a possible 5% fee policy when withdrawing without trading.

On withdrawals, the broker states a clear operational model: internal processing within 24 hours, same-day credit for digital wallets after processing, and 2–7 business days for bank/card credits; plus the key compliance rule that withdrawals can only go to methods used for deposits, with a defined priority sequence when multiple deposit methods were used.

On regulation, the FBS brand is represented by different licensed entities: CySEC (license 331/17) for the EU, FSC Belize (license 000102/31) for many non-EU regions, and ASIC (AFS Licence 426359) for Australia through the local Australian operator named on the Australia site.

Posted by FXBonus

• FXBonus's Latest Articles