IC Markets 2025 – Summary of recent issues & udpates (platform, withdrawal, fees and more)

IC Markets currently faces a major Australian class action alleging misleading conduct in its CFD offerings, alongside multiple CySEC fines against its EU branch for execution and leverage violations. The broker operates through several regulated entities in Australia, the EU, Seychelles, and the Bahamas, each with different leverage caps, protections, and dispute mechanisms. EU and Australian traders have strict safeguards such as Negative Balance Protection (NBP) and compensation schemes, while offshore users trade with higher leverage but fewer guarantees. Withdrawal times, platform maintenance, and spreads remain operationally normal, though subject to typical CFD market fluctuations. The biggest ongoing debate among traders centers on entity choice, risk controls, and how recent regulatory actions affect IC Markets’ reputation and client protection levels.

Invest in Forex with ICMarkets

IC Markets attracts a huge share of retail FX/CFD flows, and with that comes a steady stream of questions—some routine, some serious. Below is a clear, fact-driven rundown of the issues that dominate conversation right now, from ongoing litigation and penalties to practical differences between the broker’s entities, leverage, and policies that impact day-to-day trading.

The Australian class action: what it alleges, who’s involved, and current status

In Australia, a consolidated class action (Bain & Anor v International Capital Markets Pty Ltd, VID1088/2023) is proceeding against IC Markets’ Australian entity (International Capital Markets Pty Ltd). Filed on 6 February 2024 and consolidated on 2 August 2024, it alleges misleading, deceptive and unconscionable conduct in the supply of CFDs to retail clients and seeks recovery of losses. Piper Alderman and Echo Law are running the consolidated case, and it also advances claims against founder Andrew Budzinski.

Why this matters to traders: the case focuses on product suitability and retail harm, not on isolated trade disputes. It sits against the backdrop of ASIC’s product-intervention regime, which curtailed leverage and mandated protections for retail CFD clients in Australia from March 2021.

Open an account with ICMarkets

Recent CySEC penalties on IC Markets (EU) Ltd

IC Markets’ Cypriot entity has been fined more than once by CySEC in the past two years. On 1 July 2024, CySEC imposed a €50,000 fine for breaches related to client order-execution standards and disclosures. This followed a separate, earlier penalty of €200,000 connected to leverage rules. IC Markets (EU) has publicly disputed the decisions and indicated plans to appeal.

What this means in practice: the fines zero in on EU rules around best execution, cost transparency and leverage caps for retail clients. Regardless of appeals, EU-onboarded traders remain under ESMA-style protections (see Section 4).

IC Markets is not “one broker”—it’s a group of entities with different rules

This is the single biggest source of confusion. IC Markets operates multiple licensed entities. The key ones discussed by traders are:

• Australia (IC Markets AU) – International Capital Markets Pty Ltd, regulated by ASIC (AFSL 335692).
• European Union (IC Markets EU) – IC Markets (EU) Ltd, regulated by CySEC (Licence 362/18).
• Bahamas (IC Markets Ltd) – regulated by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SIA-F214).
• Seychelles (Raw Trading Ltd / “IC Markets Global”) – regulated by the FSA (SD018).
• Kenya (IC Markets KE) – regulated by the Capital Markets Authority (Licence 199).

Different regulators impose different investor protections, leverage limits, and rules. Choosing an entity is not cosmetic; it changes the framework you trade under.

Invest in Forex with ICMarkets

Leverage and “safety rails” vary by entity

EU and Australia (retail)

Retail leverage is capped under ESMA-style (EU) and ASIC (AU) measures: Up to 1:30 for major FX, with lower limits for other asset classes. Mandatory margin close-out rules and negative balance protection for retail.

Seychelles (“Global”) and Bahamas

Offshore entities offer much higher retail leverage. IC Markets Global’s own help centre lists 1:1 to 1:1000. The Bahamas site promotes tight spreads and global-market access under SCB supervision. Higher leverage is the draw, but the protections differ (next section).

The practical takeaway: if you onboard under EU or AU, your leverage and risk controls are restricted by law. Under FSA Seychelles or SCB Bahamas you can use far higher leverage—but the safety net is not the same.

Negative Balance Protection (NBP) is not uniform

• EU (retail): NBP applies to all retail clients. Professional clients are excluded.
• Australia (retail): NBP is provided to retail clients under ASIC’s product-intervention framework. IC Markets’ Australian Account Terms also specify NBP for retail, with conditional limits for wholesale.
• Negative Balance Protection (NBP) Seychelles (“Global”): IC Markets Global’s help-centre entry states clients are responsible for any negative balance; there is no blanket NBP. That’s explicit.

If you are trading under the offshore entity for higher leverage, understand that sharp gaps can push an account below zero—and you’re responsible for the deficit. That difference is one of the most discussed points among traders comparing entities.

Open an account with ICMarkets

Investor compensation and dispute resolution differ by jurisdiction

• Investor Compensation Fund (ICF) EU (CySEC): IC Markets (EU) Ltd is a member of Cyprus’ Investor Compensation Fund (ICF), which covers eligible clients up to €20,000 in the event the firm cannot return client funds.
• AFCA Australia (ASIC): Australia does not operate a statutory deposit-style compensation scheme for CFDs like the UK’s FSCS. However, IC Markets AU is a member of AFCA, the external dispute resolution body.
• Seychelles/Bahamas: There is no EU-style ICF. Protections are mainly regulatory supervision and segregation of client money; the specific compensation scheme aspect that EU retail clients rely on does not apply.

This isn’t about spreads or platform choice; it’s about legal backstops if something goes wrong with the firm itself.

Spreads, commissions, and why fills change during volatility

IC Markets markets tight pricing on Raw accounts: average EUR/USD ~0.1 pip plus commission (typically $3.5 per side per standard lot on MetaTrader). It also advertises spreads from 0.0 on certain venues/products.

However, the legal docs are unambiguous: spreads can widen significantly, quotes are indicative, and there is no guarantee that an order will execute at the indicative price—especially if you delay or during fast markets. IC Markets’ own Account Terms say there’s no limit to how wide spreads may get, and its help pages confirm there are no guaranteed stop-loss orders under the market-execution model.

In practice, you’ll see the tight numbers most of the time in liquid hours. Around major data, weekends, thin liquidity, or single-name events, expect wider spreads and slippage—particularly on indices, stocks, and crypto CFDs. That’s not unique to IC Markets; it’s how market-execution CFD pricing behaves.

Invest in Forex with ICMarkets

Trade execution, “hedging/scalping,” and strategy limits

IC Markets says it allows hedging and scalping and describes itself as an issuer using an ECN-style pricing model sourced from multiple LPs, with no dealing desk intervention and servers located in Equinix NY4 for low latency.

That doesn’t mean “anything goes.” The EU Terms define Prohibited Action to include Abusive Trading/Market Manipulation, and specifically allow the firm to disapply negative balance protection if it’s abused or if there’s misconduct/market abuse. Australian Account Terms include parallel language on NBP being withdrawn in misconduct cases. Latency arbitrage/toxic flow and similar behaviours typically fall into that “abusive” bucket across the industry; the contractual wording gives the broker wide scope to refuse orders, adjust trades, or close accounts if it detects abuse.

Key point: the line isn’t whether you “scalp,” but whether your trading exploits technical or pricing anomalies in a way the firm deems abusive under its agreement.

Withdrawals: timing, cut-offs, and “intermediary bank” friction

Withdrawals are a frequent topic because methods and timelines vary by entity and method:

• Cut-off: Requests submitted before 12:00 (noon) AEST/AEDT are processed on the same business day.
• Processing windows:
  • Cards: typically 3–5 business days (refund route where applicable).
  • International wire: up to 3–5 business days once processed; intermediary banks in cross-border transfers can introduce delays and fees that are outside the broker’s control.
• EU differences: Certain e-wallets and instant methods may not be available under the EU entity due to local/payment-partner rules; card and bank transfer are standard.

Traders sometimes compare anecdotal speeds across entities, but the core drivers are method, banking rails, and whether an intermediary bank sits in the middle of the chain.

Open an account with ICMarkets

Platform stability, scheduled work, and weekend gaps

Routine platform maintenance is typically scheduled outside peak hours and often on weekends. While the firm doesn’t offer GSLOs, it does outline server time conventions (MT4/5 set to GMT+2/+3 to align with New York close) and confirms rollover timing. Gaps can occur on Monday open, and those gaps are where slippage and negative-equity events happen most frequently in high-leverage accounts.

Risk-control implication: set size and stops with weekend risk in mind, particularly if you’re trading via the offshore entity without NBP.

Clone sites and impersonation: genuine risk you need to recognize

Regulators have issued multiple clone-firm warnings referencing sites and contacts pretending to be IC Markets or “ICMarkets.” The UK’s FCA warning lists examples of fraudulent websites and contact details with no connection to the group. IC Markets itself publishes warnings about fake websites, phishing and impersonation. This is still happening in 2024–2025.

What to watch for: mismatched domains, unsolicited approaches, pressure to deposit, and “too good to be true” claims. The FCA’s broader alerts explain how clone scams copy genuine firm details (including licence numbers) to appear legitimate.

Invest in Forex with ICMarkets

Putting it together: entity choice shapes your experience

EU and AU retail: lower leverage (max 1:30 majors), NBP, margin close-out, and—in the EU—access to the ICF up to €20,000 if the firm cannot return funds. You sacrifice raw leverage for stronger guardrails.

Seychelles/Bahamas retail: much higher leverage and widely advertised tight pricing. In exchange, NBP is not universally provided (Seychelles help centre says you’re responsible for negative balances), and there’s no EU-style compensation scheme. That raises the importance of position sizing and weekend gap management.

Add the active Australian class action to the picture, and it’s clear why these topics dominate trader discussion in 2025: they directly affect leverage, downside protection, withdrawal expectations, and the legal framework that sits behind your account. If you understand which entity you’re with—and what that implies for NBP, leverage, and recourse—you remove most of the ambiguity that fuels those debates.

A compact comparison

Open an account with ICMarkets

What traders should expect right now

• Ongoing litigation in Australia keeps focus on product suitability and disclosures to retail clients. That doesn’t change your daily platform use, but it’s a significant background issue for the AU entity.
• EU penalties underscore strict enforcement around leverage, execution and disclosures. Retail clients in the EU keep their NBP and ICF coverage regardless.
• Entity selection remains the practical fork in the road: higher protections and capped leverage under EU/AU versus higher leverage and thinner safety nets offshore. The broker’s own pages and terms make those differences explicit (NBP, spreads widening, indicative quotes).
• Withdrawals work as advertised when you factor in cut-offs, method timelines, and intermediary banking. Friction tends to be method/rail-driven rather than a broker-specific policy delay.
• Clone-site risk is real. Stick to verified domains and be alert to unsolicited contacts and mismatched details.

Bottom line

• IC Markets gives two very different experiences depending on where you sign up: Under EU/AU, you get lower leverage with strong retail protections (NBP, margin close-out, disclosures, and—under EU—ICF up to €20k). The recent CySEC penalties show the regulator is actively policing these standards.
• Under Seychelles/Bahamas, you get much higher leverage and widely advertised tight pricing. In exchange, NBP is not universally provided (Seychelles help centre says you’re responsible for negative balances), and there’s no EU-style compensation scheme. That raises the importance of position sizing and weekend gap management.

Invest in Forex with ICMarkets

Posted by FXBonus

• FXBonus's Latest Articles